On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 14:13 -0600, Kenneth Burgener wrote: > "NIS+ additionally supports secure and encrypted RPC, which helps > greatly to solve the security problems of NIS."[1] > > Curious, why is NIS+ a poor choice? > > [1]http://www.faqs.org/docs/linux_network/x-087-2-nis.nisplus.html
You didn't read far enough.
"At the time we're writing, there isn't yet a good working
implementation of NIS+ for Linux, so it isn't covered here."[1]
--
Stuart Jansen e-mail/jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
google talk: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at
the results." -- Winston Churchill
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
/* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
