On AD 2007 June 26 Tuesday 04:35:49 PM -0600, Stephen Ward wrote: > My company redistributes a Linux LiveCD based on Gentoo, which is obviously > subject to the GPL. We have a client who is citing clauses 3(a) and 3(b) of > the GPL to insist that we provide the .config file that was used to compile > the kernel on our LiveCD. Does anyone know if this is a legitimate claim? > Does the .config file count as source code that we need to make available?
What's wrong with sending him off a copy of the file? Justin /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
