On Jul 25, 2007, at 12:14 AM, Lonnie Olson wrote:

Kimball Larsen wrote:
So, I've got to handle setting up DNS on a linux box for the first time - done it before on a mac, but used a spiffy interface that hid the icky underpinnings of BIND from me and made it a cinch to set everything up. What server does everyone like here? I've heard that there are others besides BIND to consier, but not sure which ones are worth looking into.

Depends on your intended use of it. If you plan to ever include "DNS" to your resume you *must* learn to use BIND. In the general IT world DNS = BIND.

If you have few zones with tons of records, and have plenty of memory, use rbldnsd. Especially for maintaining local copies of DNS blacklists.
http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/rbldnsd.html

If you need easy integration with a database, or easy management, and frequent small changes. Look at MyDNS. Store your records in a MySQL database.

For anything else use BIND. Best feature set. Most popular. De- facto standard. Not very hard to do simple stuff.

BIND rulez!  :)

--lonnie


Thanks everyone for all your suggestions - I went ahead and used BIND, and the total time it took me to get 18 or so zones configured correctly was only about 2 hours, including all the reading I did to understand a) DNS in general and b) BIND's approach in particular. I'd heard that BIND was a bit of a beast to configure, but 2 hours is really not all that bad to go from next to zero knowledge to a fully working DNS.

Thanks!


-- Kimball



/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/

Reply via email to