On 22 Aug 2007, at 09:40, Kenneth Burgener wrote:
The reporting officer called me back this morning and we chatted about
my concerns. He was very pleasant and understanding.
The officer said that the "hit and run" is reported in the Police's
internal database, but does not show up on the "DI 9" report because
that report is mostly for statistical reasons. He also said that he
would file the "hit and run" citation at my request.
As far as the lack of no insurance citation, he let me know that the
report does show that her insurance was unknown, but since the vehicle
was just purchased and the owners have 30 days to obtain insurance, he
has no way of proving that she didn't have insurance. But by the fact
that it was reported on the report, she has 10 days to prove to the
state that she has insurance, or she will get a suspended license, and
be required to get the SR-22 insurance. I felt much better knowing
that
the state would be still perusing her lack of insurance.
Honestly, I surely hope that she does end up having insurance, as that
will make life much easier than having to take her to court to recoup
the costs!
It is a lame situation. I hope it works out for you. I think it is
good that you talked with the officer about it. I think you should
talk with anyone involved that you can in order to get it worked
out. Communication is a powerful tool.
Jonathan
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/
