Bryan Sant wrote: > This only supports a base of up to 16. Make me wonder what the limit > is for the actual libc runtime's itoa implementation. We use a base > 59 number in some software I use here at work. Why 59 and not 64? > Because we've removed the vowels so it's impossible for swear words to > be generated :-).
itoa is not a standard c library routine, as far as I can tell. It exists in a non-standard way in some libc's, but it's certainly not portable. /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
