"Bryan Sant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A blessing and a curse. Macro-based debugging has merit, but nasty
> black magic macros used for non-debugging purposes can be a bear to
> debug. I'd also argue that the single jump instruction that is
> produced with an "if (debug) {" test one would use in a language that
> doesn't support macros doesn't even register on the performance
> overhead meter. This is a total non-issue as far as performance is
> concerned. However, removing the code all together does reduce the
> size of your binary image which is kind of nice.
If debug is defined as a constant, the code ought to be completely
eliminated by any reasonable compiler. Why keep dead code around?
C-style preprocessing is pretty much the worst possible way to do most
of the things it does, but at least it does them in a fairly simple
and consistent manner.
--Levi
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/
