Nicholas Leippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> You may note that this method is impervious to double-counting, but does
> require you to get each of the 99 at least once.
There's got to be a way we could work a sheep dog into this, too.
A really smart sheep dog that can recognize when you tag a sheep with
a water-soluble paint or something, and herd it over into a corner so
you don't count it twice and it's out of the way. Even if he missed
one, you'd see the paint, too. Then we can use the regular
subtraction routine.
:P
--Levi
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/
