Steve wrote: > What about using nice and running it at a higher priority?
That's a useful strategy for CPU intensive processes, but the timing Jon posted makes it clear that the work was I/O intensive, not CPU intensive. [OT] Hey, I thought you were busy writing a new peer-to-peer UDP protocol. :-) Shane /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
