Bryan Sant wrote: > On 10/25/07, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> His numbers show a majority of time in the IO yes. But there is still >> time on the CPU, nicing it should cut that part down. Maybe not >> significantly, but hey it's worth a shot. > > I'm not disagreeing with you, but I would just point out that nicing > to a higher priority would only really help if his process is > competing with other running processes. This likely isn't the case > (unless he's running Gentoo -- in which case every process will > constantly compete with the 24x7 gcc process :-P)
Hmm, maybe we should work on the memory footprint of this sed replacement as well, because it might have to compete with Bryan's 2 GB Java "Hello world" programs. :-P Shane /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
