On Jan 24, 2008 12:42 PM, Michael L Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's quite a logical fallacy there. I guess you must know what the > EFF's intent is, though. And a bit ironic, given that you said you
I do know the EFF's intent. They want voter fraud to continue because it primarily helps the Dems. > support Ron Paul, and his platform should, if it's consistent with > itself, be in favor of banning ID checking at polling stations. > Freedom, small government, and all that. Ha. Good attempt at painting me into some crazy anarchist corner. I'm all for small government. Small government. Not *no government*. Preventing voter fraud, even if it requires some volunteer to quickly make sure the name on your picture ID matches what they have in their book, is a rational use of "government" (if you can call the voting booth worker guy that). -Bryan /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
