On Jan 26, 2008 11:20 AM, Stephen Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was emailed by someone noting that the [EMAIL PROTECTED] didn't exist and > that it would be great to create that and forward it. My thought is that it > would be heavily spammed. Do people still create webmaster? Is it a good > or bad idea? > > Stephen
I personally have all this mail go into an "administration" email account because it's usually pretty noisy. >From http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2142.txt : ... Various Internet documents have specified mailbox names to be used when reaching the operators of the new service; for example, [RFC822 6.3, C.6] requires the presence of a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mailbox name on all hosts that have an SMTP server. Other protocols have defacto standards for well known mailbox names, such as <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for NNTP (see [RFC977]), and <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for HTTP (see [HTTP]). Defacto standards also exist for well known mailbox names which have nothing to do with a particular protocol, e.g., <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. ... /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
