On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 16:12 -0700, Carl Youngblood wrote: > Actually, the APs I'm planning on using already use that OS. I guess > you're saying they will already have the things I need then. Here's > the problem though. Since I'm using multiple APs, each of them will > have to download the content at least once before they cache it, hence > my desire to place a router further upstream that could handle all of > this once.
There's a setting for a Parent Proxy which the Mikrotik can use for any cache misses. We've got a few set up in a hierarchy and it works fine. I'm sure the parent could be Squid or something else, but all of ours are Mikrotik. Corey /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
