On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:44:09AM -0600, Von Fugal wrote: > <quote name="Levi Pearson" date="Fri, 13 Jun 2008 at 11:34 -0600"> > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Scott Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I'm with Von. If it's random, it's not suppose to be predictable. > > > After the first result, the remaining results become more predictable. > > > > That raises the question of whether you *do* want it to be a random > > choice from all participants every time. It seems perfectly > > reasonable to me to exclude winners from getting multiple prizes. > > > > --Levi > > What if there's as many prizes as participants? Then you know every > participant is going to get exactly one prize. That's no fun at all.
That depends on the prizes. "First prize, a week vacation in Cuba." "Second prize, a two week vacation in Cuba." -- Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
