Levi Pearson wrote:
There's way more undeveloped land here than there is back East. I think that, again, this is due to the fact that most of the development back East occurred many years ago, when consumers valued land ownership more highly than they do now. Older developments in Utah have bigger lots, too.
+1 for Levi. Building big houses on small lots has much more to do with developer greed than it does with land constraints. The customers of developers want McMansions, not acreage, so that's what they get: a 3,000 square foot monstrosity, built behind a garage, with a broomstick's length between you and the neighbors.
--Dave /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
