<quote name="Von Fugal" date="Wed, 18 Jun 2008 at 19:17 -0600"> > <quote name="Jacob Fugal" date="Wed, 18 Jun 2008 at 19:15 -0600"> > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Von Fugal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > <quote name="Jonathan Duncan" date="Wed, 18 Jun 2008 at 16:02 -0600"> > > >> There are other candidates. > > >> > > > ... > > >> > > >> Barack H. Obama > > >> Current Office: U.S. Senate > > >> Party: Democratic > > > > > > Obama is not a choice. > > > > Last I saw, he was. He may not be one you agree with, but he is a > > choice. He's at least as much a choice as any other candidate, > > including potential write ins. > > > > Von, I know you're passionate about this subject, but a word of > > advice: it will probably help your argument if you stop using the term > > "evil" so loosely... > > Hey, it's just the cliche everyone else uses. "The lesser of two evils." > All I'm doing is pointing out the sheer silliness of the idea. > > Von Fugal
If you don't agree that they're evil and you do align your values with theirs, I have no problem with you voting for them. When someone says they must vote for the lesser of two evils, their words, not mine, then I have to interject. If someone tells me I'm crazy for not voting "strategically" I just go ballistic. Sorry. Von Fugal P.S. I have no problem with the way anyone votes, btw, that's your right. I only have problems with certain reasonings. After all, I might have a chance to help someone see a better logic. Changing someone's beliefs is a lot harder. What really makes me mad is seeing people who agree with Ron Paul but write him off because he's not viable. It just drives me batty!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
