On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 00:46 -0600, Von Fugal wrote: > <quote name="Stuart Jansen" date="Sat, 28 Jun 2008 at 23:01 -0600"> > > On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 22:44 -0600, Dave Smith wrote: > > > No webapps come to mind as being CPU intensive. I think if you plan to > > > throw lots of simulated users at it, any webapp will be CPU intensive > > > (though CPU is probably not your bottleneck in these situations). > > > > They exist. I've run across some pretty sucky sites that max my > > processor whenever I perform certain actions or scroll the window. > > Sadly, I still haven't remembered where I found them or I would have > > replied with a more useful comment to the original post. > > I'm not sure, the original post was worded kinda funny, but I think he's > talking about CPU intensity on the host side. >
Sorry, it is hard to put the whole thesis down in just a few words. I am looking at server side CPU intensity. So javascript and the like won't work. My statistics are all on the server and I will be using a bunch of client machines to pull the web page from the server to get the server CPU load to be taxed. I will be using the different frequencies that are available in the Server's CPU to see the cost/wattage savings at a given load. /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
