> > Large integer multiplication? I think the sum/carry variables gives it away. I should have renamed those too. Actually, it wasn't that obfuscated. I just thought it was sort of clever to do the sum diagonally instead of padding a larger than necessary matrix with zeros.
On a side note though, for real large integers, there are faster ways to do this. Plain old long multiplication is faster in the 20-200 digit range. There are some specialized methods for 200+ digit numbers. -Dennis /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
