Andrew McNabb wrote: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 07:22:29PM -0700, Stuart Jansen wrote: >> Anyone up for a challenge? I'll give you major geek points. > > I would try to bridge the two interfaces. > > brctl addbr br0 > brctl addif br0 eth0 > brctl addif br0 eth1 > > And then set the address for br0 to 192.168.0.2. Does that work?
Wouldn't that ruin the separation between the networks? Stuart, this way lies madness me thinks. Do I get geek points for pointing that out? Why not just do the rational thing and use two similar but different subnets, like 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24. Are you hardcoding IP addresses in whatever it is you're testing? -- Hans Fugal ; http://hans.fugal.net There's nothing remarkable about it. All one has to do is hit the right keys at the right time and the instrument plays itself. -- Johann Sebastian Bach /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
