Re: SCO gets $2MM

[Steven Alligood]

It's the part about selling off assets that would have interested the Investors. I would put money down that the deal was the 2 million dollars for a percentage of the asset sales. It would basically be a liquidation move on SCO's part in order to stay in the courts long enough to try and get the brass ring. The Investors will be interested in making money on the asset sales, something you will never read about in a public relations article from SCO.

-Steve

On 03/15/2010 02:31 PM, Tod Hansmann wrote:

I would think the track record of the company's litigations would kind
of spell everything out for anyone.

-Tod Hansmann

On 3/15/2010 2:23 PM, Merrill Oveson wrote:

Some investors are smarter than other investors.  I believe this group
of investors falls into the "other" category.

On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Gabriel Gunderson<g...@gundy.org>   wrote:

Lenders to fund operating, administrative and litigation expenses.

Let me fix that....

Lenders to fund FUD and litigation expenses.


http://ir.sco.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=451740


Gabe

/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/

/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/

/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/