How can they afford this? Are even producing a nickel of revenue? In my mind, the lawyers for SCO are providing bad legal advice if they are advising their client to continue. (Of course, the lawyers have a vested interest...)
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:37 AM, Charles Curley <[email protected]> wrote: > SCO rises from the dead (again) > New trial, please > > By Cade Metz in San Francisco • Get more from this author > > Posted in Software, 8th July 2010 17:12 GMT > > SCO has risen from the grave. Again. > > On June 10, US judge Ted Stewart ruled that Novell does indeed own the > UNIX copyrights the The SCO Group so vehemently laid claim to, ending a > six-year legal battle between the two. But, yes, SCO has now appealed > Stewart's judgment, according to those dogged SCO-watchers at Groklaw. > > Though Stewart upheld a jury decision in favor of Novell and rejected > SCO's application to have the case reheard, SCO has now asked the > United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit to hear the case > and overturn Stewart's ruling. And if that doesn't happen, SCO wants, > yes, a new trial. > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07/08/sco_appeals_again/ > > I think I'm getting motion sickness. > > > -- > > Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign > Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards > and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email > http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email > > Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB > > /* > PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net > Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug > Don't fear the penguin. > */ /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
