On Wednesday 27 April 2011, Nicholas Leippe wrote: > From a purely theoretical perspective (dunno if puppet allows you to > do it this way), I would suggest a base class that only holds stuff > that is in common between both configurations, then derive two > classes--one for each variation. Then you don't have any chance of > forgetting to override something and sending a bad config to the wrong > place.
I have tried that before and puppet can do it. But when I read about inheritance yesterday, I tried it this other way. So either way works, I'm questioning which one way "better" or "more correct" as far as Puppet is concerned. -- Jacob Albretsen [email protected] http://blog.knine.net/ /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
