On 5/26/2011 2:07 AM, Levi Pearson wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Jason<[email protected]> wrote: >> Well lets see. I could make a vain attempt to justify what i said or i >> could apologize and chalk it up to people make mistakes. Nah i'll blame >> it on the nazi party like any good libertarian would, but i'm not a >> libertarian. Looks like i'm stuck with mental illness of the undiagnosed >> variety. Then again i could flip off my sarcasm switch... >> >> None of this is my story and i,m sticking to it. > > Man, that's no fun. I was hoping you'd retrench and start quoting > Mises or Hayek and put up a few links to lewrockwell.com or something, > along with some lofty comments about the logical superiority of > libertarian thought and a laundry list of Stuart's disagreements with > the Truth, a.k.a. libertarian philosophical tenets. Oh well, maybe > someone who actually is a libertarian will take up that role? > > --Levi > > /* > PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net > Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug > Don't fear the penguin. > */ > My thinking is that the value of a thought is not in its presentation but in its perception. Stuart doesn't want to see any side but his own and so he limits his perceptional capacity to that singular vantage point. While that is his choice i see no point in changing it against his will. When he wants to learn the truth he will listen in the mean time i'm sure everyone have fun watching him pursue his aspirations of megalomania at the expense of anyone he feels like targeting.
/* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
