On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Lonnie Olson <[email protected]> wrote: > Important thing to consider is Murphy's law. The minimum number of > disk failures to destroy your whole array. In RAID6, it's 3 disks. > In RAID10, it's 2 disks. Obviously this would have to be a matched > pair, but s#!* happens.
I haven't studied raid6--how flexible is it regarding which 3 disks can fail, compared to raid10's up to half excluding both from a mirrored pair? /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
