On 03/13/2013 04:53 PM, John Nielsen wrote: > Using LVM would give me what I'm looking for, but I really would just > use it for the naming so it seems kind of silly: - each drive would > be its own volume group - each volume group would have exactly one > logical volume
I would still recommend LVM. The overhead is essentially nil, it's quite standard across distributions, and it's robust. You'll also have flexibility if your needs change down the road. Corey /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
