On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Levi Pearson <[email protected]> wrote: > Seriously, pi is 4? Do you understand that if this guy was actually right, we > wouldn't be able to build a proper bicycle, much less a computer or a nuclear > reactor.
He only derives pi as 4 for kinematic scenarios, not static. Furthermore, he explains why engineers have mostly succeeded despite some faulty equations, and shows how NASA's data confirm his changes to orbital equations. (eg, the pioneer anomaly becomes fully solved). /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
