On 3/22/2013 12:03 AM, Michael Torrie wrote: > On 03/21/2013 10:45 PM, Tod Hansmann wrote: >> I want to throw Hobbit on that list. I've worked with a lot of >> monitoring software and I have always found Hobbit to be the most >> efficient and flexible. > I could be wrong but I think it's called xymon now. The web page leaves > something to be desired... > http://xymon.sourceforge.net/ You are indeed correct on the name change. I'm not sure what you mean about the web page. Do you need graphic design or system monitoring? You can see a demo of it and a sample of the data it gathers by going to his home network demo: http://www.xymon.com/xymon/
At the time of this writing, he's got a drive that's having some SMART errors, and it's providing some nice data on that: http://www.xymon.com/xymon-cgi/svcstatus.sh?HOST=blixen.hswn.dk&SERVICE=smart I like it. Simple, minimalistic, performant, detailed, flexible. I could never come up with anything it couldn't do with some minor scripting on my part if I wanted to get fancy. Anyway, that's just my opinion on it. I realize it's not a popular one, or someone else would have mentioned it already =c) -Tod Hansmann /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
