On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 06:44:25 PM Jima wrote: > On 2013-04-23 17:59, Dennis Muhlestein wrote: > > On 4/16/13 5:04 PM, Ryan Simpkins wrote: > >> On Tue, April 16, 2013 16:06, Dennis Muhlestein wrote: > >> > >> Recently I've been happy with Comcast. Despite their questionable > >> business > >> practices, the actual product is quite functional. I just got upgraded > >> last > >> night and tested a solid 55Mbps down and 10Mbps up. 40ms to the work VPN. > >> I've had a few minor outages. That's a typical issue with them it seems. > >> Of course with all things Comcast - YMMV. > > > > Do any of you have static ip addresses with Comcast? Did you have to > > pay extra? > > With Comcast? Last I checked (a few years ago, in Minnesota), that > would require a business-class account, which is more expensive per > month for less bandwidth, and is subject to a (at the time) $250 > "installation fee" -- actually more like an activation fee, since you > have to pay it even if you already have coax. And yes, you have to pay > extra per month for the static IPs.
Do they play stupid pricing games with their business class? First 6 - 12 month is one price, then it doubles the next 12 months and you have to do a 2 year contract kind of garbage? /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
