What about a frame relay? Do those still exist?
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:36 AM, S. Dale Morrey <[email protected]>wrote: > I should clarify that the real risk is this data leaving Colorado. A point > to point connection isn't feasible, the data needs to traverse the > internet, but do so only within the state of Colorado. If it crosses > statelines it becomes a legal issue, not a technical one. Think about the > way courts treat internet gambling (i.e. it falls under federal > jurisdiction because the data crosses state lines even if both parties are > in the same state). This gives you an idea of the reasoning, but no it's > not gambling. > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Gabriel Gunderson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:27 PM, S. Dale Morrey <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Is keeping this data within the state feasible while using TCP/IP? > > > > It has little to do with TCP/IP and a lot to do with what network > > you're using. If you're planning on using the Internet, you will have > > packets going to Denver, LA or Chicago just to make it to a server > > across town. > > > > The requirements seem to suggest that they're misinformed about what > > the real risks are and how they can be sensibly addressed. > > > > > > Best, > > Gabe > > > > /* > > PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net > > Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug > > Don't fear the penguin. > > */ > > > > /* > PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net > Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug > Don't fear the penguin. > */ > -- -- -- Matthew Frederico /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
