On Monday, June 10, 2013 04:24:11 PM Jessie A. Morris wrote: > More important is not that you can create an experiment to prove your > hypothesis, but that you can create an experiment that disproves that > hypothesis. By disproving it in a verifiable way once, all of your "proving > evidence" has been disproved.
yes, but you understood my argument. And besides, if I was somehow financially motivated to not disprove my hypothesis then I would craft a better experiment. Look at the research groups paid for by Monsanto that are suggesting research shows pesticides are not harmful for us to eat! lol -- Regards, Nathan England ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ NME Computer Services http://www.nmecs.com Nathan England ([email protected]) Systems Administration / Web Application Development Information Security Consulting (480) 559.9681 /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
