On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Barry Roberts <b...@robertsr.us> wrote: > > I looked at RoR a long time ago when it was all the hotness. So my > opinion may be outdated, but here it is: RoR is really good at making > simple CRUD web apps that are backed by a database. But if you want > to go much beyond field-based editing of records in web forms, it gets > painful in a hurry. It makes the easy things easy, and the hard > things much harder. Again, just my (possibly outdated) opinion.
As someone who has been doing web programming since 1996 and using rails since 2005, I would like to respectfully disagree. I don't find much in rails that makes hard things hard. It has a great deal of modularity and you can replace simple things with complex things when needed. FWIW. /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */