Thanks for all the thoughts so far. I suppose a better title could be "NFS Performance" or "Moving to NFS from iSCSI". Everyone has helped me get down the road further on researching this and you have all helped me solidify some conclusions I had already come to but wasn't 100% sure on. I'll share details later this week as I find time to gather all the requirements and current configuration. On May 7, 2016 2:30 AM, "Robert Fleming" <[email protected]> wrote:
> What is you're work load and what is the purpose of nfs vs Iscsi. What is > the underlying file system for your nfs share? What is you're block and > strip size? What is your disk layout? How much memory is in your > machine? What are your sysctl conf settings or kernel Params. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On May 5, 2016, at 12:41 PM, Daniel Fussell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 05/04/2016 09:57 PM, Ed Felt wrote: > >> Just looking for comments and general information from anyone who can > >> further enlighten me on trying to get NFS (whichever version) to be as > fast > >> (or comparable to) iSCSI. Any comments on settings, other research I > can > >> look at, and experience would be greatly appreciated. A little light > >> reading for those interested: > >> > >> > > > > I've not used iSCSI, but as I understand, it dominates NFS when it comes > > to metadata operations and high numbers of small IO workloads. The > > larger your file becomes, or the less metadata heavy it becomes, the > > less it matters. > > > > Grazie, > > ;-Daniel > > > > > /* > PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net > Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug > Don't fear the penguin. > */ > /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
