meep wrote: 
> 
> The next stage of development for me is to implement pseudo-polling by
> implementing MQTT. This will hopefully eliminate the requirement for an
> open port, though I have some concerns about latency. And of course this
> will only be as secure as mqtt over https can be.
> 

Hi Meep. Interesting. I've played with MQTT and seemed simple / good -
let us know how it goes. Got a bit worried when starting to read 'this
very detailed review'
(http://vasters.com/archive/MQTT-An-Implementers-Perspective.html)
(though biased I guess) pointed out -so- many flaws with MQTT in the
general case.

Probably not so problematic for this/our type of usage I reckon. Note to
self: maybe websockets is worth another look...


------------------------------------------------------------------------
nickb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=66261
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=107009

_______________________________________________
plugins mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins

Reply via email to