leadears wrote: > How's performance with this? I tried analyzing remote files - it worked > but glacially. Probably ntfs via samba, the projected completion was > weeks. Working with local files was much quicker (workable). A solution > without the need to copy files around would be nice (-:
i'm on the beginning on this journey, so i can report lster. I've changed solution again. What is also working is a virtual machine (here virtualbox) in OSX and map the remote share NOT within Windows instead map this remote share as local share via virtualbox. Of course first map this remote share within the host. Sounds odd, but works..... I have 80.000 files to proceed. But i've also have a mac pro with 12 cores, so i'll tell you later..... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ mamema's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=44662 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=113991 _______________________________________________ plugins mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
