mherger wrote: 
> 
> I just added a bit of code to monitor the ratelimit. And I'm pretty sure
> 
> quite a the few of these failures are due to hitting the limit. In the
> few  
> minutes I monitored activity I got two such failures due to the limit  
> myself :-(.
> 
> The limit of 120 isn't a hard limit it seems. But under heavy load they 
> 
> even lower this value:
> 
> [13-01-04 10:28:32.9882] Plugins::SmartMix::API::_getResponseBody (271) 
> 
> x-ratelimit-limit: 91
> [13-01-04 10:28:32.9885] Plugins::SmartMix::API::_getResponseBody (271) 
> 
> x-ratelimit-remaining: 87
> [13-01-04 10:28:32.9888] Plugins::SmartMix::API::_getResponseBody (271) 
> 
> x-ratelimit-used: 4
> 
> At other times they are more generous:
> 
> [13-01-04 10:31:28.5371] Plugins::SmartMix::API::_getResponseBody (271) 
> 
> x-ratelimit-limit: 120
> [13-01-04 10:31:28.5374] Plugins::SmartMix::API::_getResponseBody (271) 
> 
> x-ratelimit-remaining: 120
> [13-01-04 10:31:28.5376] Plugins::SmartMix::API::_getResponseBody (271) 
> 
> x-ratelimit-used: 10
> 
> Or their math is totally wrong :-).
> 
> -- 
> 
> Michael

TEN seems to monitor which keys run into the call restriction, after
constantly running into it I was told I could upgrade my account here:
https://developer.echonest.com/account/upgrade
Since I never did, I don't know what the result would have been - but
maybe this could improve the situation.

Roland


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland0's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=56808
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97668

_______________________________________________
plugins mailing list
plugins@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins

Reply via email to