dafiend wrote: > Are you basing this claim on double-blind tests? If not, your statement > is audiophool folklore. Blind testing is required to rule out that > perceived differences are due to the placebo effect. > > Your claim of an audible difference at 320 kbps contradicts what I've > seen in scientific listening tests. (As a starting point, 'here ' > (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codec_listening_test)are references to a > bunch of listening tests. Alternatively, check out the "Listening Tests" > subforums on hydrogenaudio.org.)
Why not trust your own ears, instead of what "others" might have heard...... I can defanately hear the diffference on my system, and thats it for me.... Callesoroe Living room: Transporter, Tact RCS 2.2X digital preamp, Martin Logan Vista speakers, AMPS(Icepower): Acoustic Reality Ear Enigma PLUS(PANELS), Acoustic Reality Ear TWO MKII(Bas) Kitchen: Transporter, Prodipe Pro 5 active bi-amp speakers. Bedroom: Receiver+UE boombox, Kids: Receiver+Active speakers, WIMP-HIFI flac streaming. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ callesoroe's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=22693 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=102351 _______________________________________________ plugins mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
