bpa wrote: > Underlying problem is Windows implementation of a pipe is broken which > necessitated an exception - out of curiousity I'm checking an old XP > system to see if there is a change. One of the problems yes. But my point > was that the parser seems to be very generous in what it considers to be a header. utgg seems to confirm. If it had a more rigorous definition, it sounds like it would have moved on to the next header in the file and maybe recovered (although then we wouldn't have found this bug!).
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Davidg1's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35004 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53229 _______________________________________________ plugins mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
