I used Adalon quite a bit in the 2.6 days and I agree fully about the lack of Windows conventions. However, the 3.0 release was vastly improved, based on the beta that I had tried out. The interface was better as well. Unfortunately, my new company balked at the price...
Enter Plum, and I am again happy! (and the price is right!) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan O'Keefe Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 11:49 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [plum] Good Morning >> IMHO, java windows interfaces are ugly and klunky to work with. e.g, the >> Adalon wireframing tool. > > Hey Dan-- don't rag on Adalon! :) It's a cool tool, and I know those guys > put their hearts and souls into it. They can't help it if Java looks like > that. Give a brother a break! :) (*good-natured ribbing*) I agree it is a cool tool, and valuable especially in the Fusebox world, but as a former user, I quickly discarded it due to the non-window conventions it seemed to exhibit, from the best of my memory. Now, in their next point release, it will support CFC construction, I plan on taking a gander again. Dan ********************************************************************** You can subscribe to and unsubscribe from lists, and you can change your subscriptions between normal and digest modes here: http://www.productivityenhancement.com/support/DiscussionListsForm.cfm ********************************************************************** ********************************************************************** You can subscribe to and unsubscribe from lists, and you can change your subscriptions between normal and digest modes here: http://www.productivityenhancement.com/support/DiscussionListsForm.cfm **********************************************************************
