Thanks, Jeff, for the reply regarding a web archive.

Since I can't browse the archives, I guess I'll have to bother you all "live."

I'm trying to evaluate Plum versus other tools/frameworks out there, especially 
fusebox.

I've been playing with Plum now for a week and have been working my way through 
the tutorials... I'm about 1/4 of the way through.

I have also read everything I've been able to Google about Plum.

While I like what I've experienced of Plum, I'm a bit concerned about it's 
"proprietary" nature and what appears to be the lack of a
robust user community (except for this somewhat invisible list).

I'm also concerned about using Plum on the job I'm attempting to do. I'd 
appreciate any advice anyone can offer about the wisdom of
forging ahead with Plum.

I created and continue to manage an old, clunky CF web (we started in 1994, 
probably with CF1.0) that has grown piecemeal over the
past 10 years (http://www.globalschoolhouse.org). (Developing/managing this 
site is only one of the many things I do in this
organization).

Because of its evolution over such a long time, with no retrenchment along the 
way, we basically have several unique CF
applications, each with its own unique user interfaces and data requirements 
and even navigation methods... Although we do have a
homegrown sitewide user authentication scheme. Also, over the years, we've 
never systematically developed any framework or system of
reusing our code, other than some sitewide includes and lots of cut/paste/adapt.

As we proceed with the development of yet another unique application, I've 
finally decided it's time to impose some order on this
system, and the question is, can I do it with Plum.

I'm beginning I think that I could develop (or at least prototype) my 
yet-another-new application in Plum, and then go back and
retrofit the existing applications into the Plum method. However we already 
have close to 100K users in my existing user table, with
several related tables that are used by the various sub-applications.

For instance, we use a STATE and COUNTRY lookup table to translate CA into 
California and US into United States, for example.

Also, some of our applications demand more contact information than others (we 
work with teachers and students). Teachers who want
to participate in any of our projects must include both school and home contact 
information before they can register for the project
(otherwise, we require minimal information: school name, state, country and 
zip). Hence, we have separate tables for school
addresses and home addresses.

Furthermore, the email address of EVERY registrant must be validated via email 
delivery and their reply, after which their record
must THEN be reviewed and approved by one of our moderators before they become 
eligible to participate in one of our projects.

Thus, at the minimum, I believe I will have to modify the login/NewUserForm.cfm 
in order to retrofit the authentication to my
existing data tables.

The first question is, does this sound feasible in Plum?

--------------------------------------------------------'

Question 2: While PLUM will be useful for my administrative management of the 
web site, much of our data requirements for our
applications that teachers and students interact with simply don't lend 
themselves to simple form tables. For instance, in some
instances we need to do live-interactive drill-down queries that present form 
choices based on the previous input so as not to
overwhelm the client with too many choices presented all at once.

Thus, I'll want to include a sophisticated form and display generator within 
the Plum application framework for several of our
client applications.

Will Plum let me do this?

---------------------------------------------------------
Question 3:

We also want to include frame generators, DHTML dropdown navigation menus, and 
eventually integrate open source applications such as
forums, blogs, etc.

Will permit and/or support these kinds of additions?

---------------------------------------------------------
Question 4 (final question):

One of the things that lends credence to Fusebox is the vigorous user support 
that exists in an open source framework.

Plum seems to have a fairly limited following at this time, and it's not clear 
to me at this point how much commitment the Churvis
brothers have to the ongoing support and development.  I know it's very 
reasonable, even to purchase for all that it does, but I'm
not clear about ongoing support and development.

The question is: What am I missing?

--------------------------------

I'll appreciate any insights you can provide, and any additional third-party 
evaluations and reviews you can steer me to (As I said,
I've already read everything I can reasonably google on this subject).

Al

--------------------------------
Al Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Global SchoolNet Foundation
http://www.globalschoolnet.org


**********************************************************************
You can subscribe to and unsubscribe from lists, and you can change
your subscriptions between normal and digest modes here:

http://www.productivityenhancement.com/support/DiscussionListsForm.cfm
**********************************************************************

Reply via email to