I agree your logic is solid, but would have to say in this case, the editor works much better than their site. I did not even know they had one. I originally downloaded it from sourceforge I believe.
I use it everywhere, nothing else. Seems like every time this comes up on cf-talk, tinyMCE and fckEditor appear to be the favorites. I did try the version coming out a while back and quickly stopped spending time on it. I am sure when it comes out of beta it will be pretty solid, and I will share with you my testing of it and how it performs in an Application. Dan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philip Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 12:08 PM Subject: RE: [plum] Plum Comments > > From: Scott F Stroz > > > > 3. No support for FireFox with the WYSIWYG used to add/edit content. > > FCKEditor is pretty good cross-browser WYSIWYG. > > Not to disparage, the editor might be cross-browser, but the website for > FCKEditor sucks in so many ways > > I was on the site earlier and about 4/5 clicks returned an error > > My thoughts are that if they can't even keep their site going, then how > good is the editor itself going to be? > > > Am I being too harsh on it? > > > > ********************************************************************** > You can subscribe to and unsubscribe from lists, and you can change > your subscriptions between normal and digest modes here: > > http://www.productivityenhancement.com/support/DiscussionListsForm.cfm > ********************************************************************** ********************************************************************** You can subscribe to and unsubscribe from lists, and you can change your subscriptions between normal and digest modes here: http://www.productivityenhancement.com/support/DiscussionListsForm.cfm **********************************************************************
