David H. DeWolf wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> "David H. DeWolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/16/2005 07:27:11 PM:
>>
>>  > Zheng had put together an initial framework for the Admin
>> portlets.  In
>>  > essence, the framework was as scaled down version of struts -
>>  > specifically designed for portlets. While it was great work, I am
>>  > personally opposed to hosting a framework (no matter how scaled
>> down) in
>>  > pluto, simply because I could see maintenance of the framework alone
>>  > growing out of control quickly.  Enhancement requests would role in
>>  > simply due to the fact that others are using the framework for
>> different
>>  > portlets. . . .
>>  >
>>  > I'm curious what others thoughts are.  IMHO we have 3 choices.  Please
>>  > indicate your preference:
>>  >
>>  > [ ] Utilize an existing framework for the admin portlet.  Why rewrite?
>>  > [ ] Roll our own framework for the admin portlet. Why not?
>> [X] Utilize a simple controller portlet.  Simplicity is best!
>>

You could add an additionnal option: roll your own framework but contribute
it in bridges rather than directly in pluto so that it gets more exposure
as a stand-alone framework (and also decouple the container from the framework).

>> I'd rather not add any other complexity to the mix including
>> portals-bridges.
>>

Bridges does not really add complexity since it releases individual
bridge artefacts and not a complete heavyweight binary so you could
simply use a struts-bridge if that's waht you aim for or roll you own
there and depend only on your framework.

I'm aware that Christophe in Graffito is also working on his own
portlet framework... better to have everyone sharing his thoughts on
bridges and shows his ideas rather that having several "private" frameworks
hidden in every portals subproject.

>> Zheng is welcome to take over control of the portlet admin app for
>> Pluto 1.1. I'd like to contribute an interface for user management and
>> User Information Attributes.
> 
> 
> Ideally, all of us would contribute to the effort.  I think we're
> starting to build a stronger community and am looking forward to more
> and more collaboration and less isolated development.
> 
> (I know Craig didn't necisarily mean to suggest that the admin portlet
> is "controlled" by a main developer, but I just wanted to clarify for
> those new to the community.)
> 

+1

-- 
Raphaël Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache Portals - Enterprise Portal in Java
http://portals.apache.org/

Reply via email to