+1 for a new binary cut, including Craig's fixes and David's proposed updated maven goals.
I'm on vacation the next couple of weeks so I hope I can pound out some remaing bug fixes post beta2. Regards, Elliot Sent from webmail (apologies for the poor quoting) >>> "David H. DeWolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/24/06 8:50 PM >>> sounds good. . . would you add a bug to jira that accurately details which files need to be updated. This will allow us to automate these updates during the mvn install by the time we're ready for GA. Since we're making changes anyways, I'd also like to update the maven goals to be in the current groupId. Thanks for the thorough testing, David Craig Doremus wrote: > Sorry, David for the mixed message. > > The binary release that you cut produced an 'About Pluto' portlet that > indicated that the Pluto version was 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT. I added changes to > the beta2 tag where About Pluto now reports the Pluto version of > 1.1.0-beta2. I also updated files in the beta2 tagged directory to make > the version test in the testsuite to work correctly with a 1.1.0-beta2 > version. > > Therefore, I give a -1 to releasing the original binary cut that you > did, and a +1 to a version based on what is now in the SVN beta2 tagged > directory > (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/portals/pluto/tags/release-1.1.0-beta2/). > It's a small change, but very significant to allow a user to tell what > version of Pluto he/she is using at the time via the About Pluto > portlet.This information is very valuable in a Jira or > pluto-user/pluto-dev post of a problem with Pluto. > /Craig > P.S. I put binary cuts of the new version in > http://people.apache.org/~cdoremus/pluto/pluto-1.1-dist/beta2/ > >> hmmm. . .so I'm not sure what your suggesting. . . >> >> a +1 means roll the release the way it is, but your email suggests >> that we recut it. Can you explain??? Either way, the tag should >> match the release, not a modified version of the release. >> >> David >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> I found a minor issue with the proper version not displaying in the >>> 'About >>> Pluto' portlet and added fixes to the 1.1.0-beta2 tagged branch in >>> Subversion. >>> /Craig >>> >>> Original Message: >>> ----------------- >>> From: David H. DeWolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 20:30:48 -0400 >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [VOTE] 1.1.0-beta2 >>> >>> >>> The test builds for 1.1.0-beta2 have been out for almost a week. >>> I've heard of no issues. Please vote as to whether or not we should >>> release these binaries. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> >>> David >>> >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> mail2web - Check your email from the web at >>> http://mail2web.com/ . >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
