El mar, 06-03-2007 a las 21:02 +0100, Carsten Ziegeler escribió: (...) > > > > So, I'd support both policies. As our projects keep maturing, having > > stable and trustable releases is a must. > > > > Carsten, am I missing something, or got some idea wrong? > > > If there is consensus that a specific RC (or the current svn) should > be > the final release, the release package has to be prepared and then > voted > on. It is not good practice to vote on an RC, change the contents (for > example by just removing the RC postfix on the version umber) and then > push this out as the final release. > The vote has to be done on the "real thing". >
True, as the name of the release appears often *inside* source or build files. Regards Santiago
