Charles Severance wrote:
That was my first suspicion too - so I added the user-attribute entries
- but it still did not work.
Now in the light of day - I realized that the user-attribute entries
needed to be in <portlet-app> - not <portlet> :)
So now I have them in the right place and viola - it all works. Thanks.
I might just comment that PLT.17 is really silly in its wording. It
talks of "mapping" - there is no mapping going on in user-attributes -
it is just filtering.
Thanks for the clarification. . .I had read through that part of the
spec when I first did the impl and the reason I wondered if I was 100%
done or not was because I couldn't figure out why all I was doing was
filtering :) and no mapping!
Glad to hear it works.
David
There is real mapping in security-role-ref (PLT.20) - but 286 should
reword PLT.17 to talk of filtering not mapping.
/Chuck
On Mar 12, 2007, at 8:15 AM, David H. DeWolf wrote:
Chuck,
this could be the "mapping/filtering" logic that's required by the
spec. are your user attributes registered in the portlet.xml? It was
implemented in phases (and I'm not convinced it's 100% done yet).
David
Charles Severance wrote:
I swear that I had UserInfo working in a pre-release in 1.1.1 and
then it started failing. Here is what happens:
I happily have my UserInfoService Implementation in My
OptionalContainerServices implementation - and my service code gets
called and right before it returns the user info to the container it
happily prints out a nicely populated user info object.
Then back in my portlet - the user info object is null. Here is some
debug print:
sakai.view=snoop.test
Found Current User=csev
(fomr my service)
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], user.name.given=Charles,
user.name.family=Severance, user.name.nickName=Charles Severance}
(from my Portlet) UserInfo = {}
Map userInfo = (Map)
request.getAttribute(PortletRequest.USER_INFO);
System.out.println("UserInfo = "+userInfo);
I swear this was working with the 1.1.1 trunk and then broke just
before the 1.1.1 release.
I will look into it - just thought this might ring some bells.
/Chuck
