Dettborn wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ate Douma schrieb:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
David H. DeWolf wrote:
The biggest question is probably concerning licensing and if we're
allowed to publish it. This may not be an issue, but it's
something we need to look into before we move forward.
Yes this will be a problem, under this point of view this will be a
big problem. So there won't be so many api changes, so we can let it
as it is.
Yepp,
I'm not sure why we have to deploy this into a public available
repository? Shouldn't the api be just a module which is build
during the
whole build as well?
I agree, this shouldn't be made available in a public repository yet
and I also don't see any technical reason why it should.
You really would need to get clearance from IBM for that.
For the version I guess '2.0-ED2-Rev13' is fine.
Yes, not SNAPSHOT for sure.
Not sure what was decided here...
As long as the jar file is marked as draft version of JSR 286 I don't
have any issues with putting them in a Apache repository.
Once the JSR 286 is final and approved we plan to submit the source code
of the files under the Apache license to the pluto project, like we did
with JSR 168.
Stefan
