Yes, it looks like Ajay has sorted this out with pluto-396 (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLUTO-396 ) . Can somebody take a
look at his patch and if it looks good integrate it? We've been looking
to move Geronimo to use Pluto 1.2 but this is one of the problems that
we're having.
Thanks,
Joe
Marc Veary wrote:
361
However, I see you have sorted it :-)
On 7/18/07, *Ajay Panagariya* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Thanks for that tip.I believe you're talking about Pluto-247?
On 7/18/07, *Marc Veary* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
There was a patch added to URL parser, I'm not sure if this has
had impact on this. I'll have a look.
Kind regards,
--
Marc
On 7/17/07, * Ajay Panagariya* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Hi,
I've got a problem when I try to pass parameters that are
formatted as URI's.
Some URI's are of the form
(a) http://www.example.com/test?item=pluto.apache.com
<http://www.example.com/test?item=pluto.apache.com>
others are of the form
(b)
http://www.example.com/test?item=pluto.apache.com/wiki?id=1234
<http://www.example.com/test?item=pluto.apache.com/wiki?id=1234>
In (b), the special characters get encoded as %F3's, etc.
When it gets to processAction method in the portlet, the URI
of concern (the 'item' parameter in this case) looks fine.
By this parameters gets to the doView, I've lost everything
after the '?'.
As it stands, I'm using URI.getPath() and URI.getQuery(),
and passing each half seperately, but this solution really
doesn't lend itself to flexibility. I can't figure out what
the problem is or why the URI isn't passed properly. This
portlet code has worked in previous version of Pluto, but in
the current 1.2 it does not seem to work as expected. Can
anyone shed some light onto a possible solution, or maybe
what I might be doing wrong? Has anyone encountered this before?
I am trying to port some portlets (no pun intended) to Pluto
1.2, but my solution of URI.getPath() and URI.getQuery()
seems to look worse and worse idea with each portlet I need
to repair.
I know a lot happens between processAction and doView, and
I've tried stepping through it, but I can't seem to pinpoint
where my URI is getting chopped in half.
-Ajay Panagariya
