Ate Douma wrote:
> Hi Carsten,
> 
> I'm +1 on doing this.
> 
> My suggestion is to create a /portals/portlet-spec svn folder.
> Underneath that, we then could have:
>   /portlet-api-1.0/
>   /portlet-api-2.0/
>   /src/site/
>   /pom.xml
> 
> The portlet-api-1.0/src/main/java folder should be a svn *copy* from:
>   /portals/pluto/tags/import/src/api
> 
> The portlet-api-2.0/src/main/java folder should be a svn *move* from:
>   /portals/pluto/trunk/portlet2-api/src/main/java
> 
> The /src/site/resources/javadoc/portlet-api-1.0/ folder should be a svn
> *move* from:
>   /portals/pluto/trunk/src/site/resources/portlet-1.0-apidocs/
> 
> The /src/site/resources/javadoc/portlet-api-2.0/ folder should be a svn
> *move* from:
>   /portals/pluto/trunk/src/site/resources/portlet-2.0-apidocs/
> 
> And of course, for all the above new appropriate maven 2 build
> configurations will need to be setup.
> 
> This way, we can publish the portlet-api javadocs through:
> 
>   http://portals.apache.org/porlet-spec/portlet-api-1.0/
>   http://portals.apache.org/porlet-spec/portlet-api-2.0/
> 
> and of course provide a general overview page (possibly with further
> pointers and info) at:
> 
>   http://portals.apache.org/portlet-spec/
> 
> I think that would be *very* helpful.
> 
Good plan! I'll add an issue for this and try to move/copy the stuff in
the next days.

> Finding the right portlet api javadoc online always has been "messy",
> and using the above would finally give them a very clear and easy to
> remember "home".
Yepp

> 
> One more thing with regard to the api *source*: Its obvious we cannot do
> "releases" of these as they are JCP spec bound.
> So, IMO there is no need for using /trunk, /tags, etc. svn sub folders
> for them.
Agreed.

> However, as you know the portlet-api-2.0 OSGi meta-data configuration
> currently in pluto trunk is different from the *currently* provided
> download at the JCP, but that will be fixed (hopefully soon) by the
> JSR-286 spec lead with an errata.
> Furthermore, the new JSR-286 spec lead (Scott Nicklous) gave his OK for
> us (Portals) to push out a newly build portlet-api-2.0.jar with (only)
> the fixed OSGi configuration to Maven central repository.
> This however would still be a "2.0" release.
Which is not really possible as we can change the central maven repo or
any local copies of people, but an updated errata release will fix this.

Carsten

-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
[email protected]

Reply via email to