Dear Apache Portals Pluto Team and community,

It took me a few weeks to find room in my schedule, but thanks to Woonsan's 
helpful advice I've staged another candidate for the new Apache Portals Pluto 
3.0.1
release.

This release candidate includes:

* Fully compliant Reference Implementation of the new Portlet 3.0 Specification 
per JCR-362
     https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=362
* Fully completed (and corrected) TCK (Test Compatibility Kit) for Portlet Spec 
3.0
* Updated portlet-api with associated Javadoc improvements
* General bugfixes
* Updated archetypes

Please review the release candidate for this project which is found in the 
following maven staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheportals-1022/

As Woonsan asked, the source and other artifacts have been made available at 
the /dist/dev directory:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/portals/pluto/

(These files will be promoted to /dist/release if the vote passes)

The Release Notes are available here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10560&version=12338908

The KEYS file to verify the release artifacts signature can be found here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/portals/pluto/KEYS

Please review the release candidates and vote on releasing Apache Portals Pluto 
3.0.1

REMINDER: According to the following policy:
http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
  "Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download all
   signed source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that they meet
   all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, validate all
   cryptographic signatures, compile as provided, and test the result on their
   own platform."

Seeing as how I am sending this on a Friday again, the normal vote of 72 hours
seems unreasonable. Therefore I would like to extend the vote to 96 hours.

Please cast your vote:

[ ] +1 for Release
[ ]  0  for Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't release (do provide a reason then)


Best Regards to all,

Neil

Reply via email to