On Sep 26, 3:16 pm, David Beazley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, this would be a good feature to add to PLY-2.6. I'll have to think of > some new scheme for knowing when to run the update. Right now PLY relies on > MD5 signatures, but this > being deprecated in Python 3.0 so I'll have to come up with an alternative > (maybe I'll do some kind of thing with hash keys). >
Don't you already implement it for parser tables in PLY 2.5 ? I suppose it can be implemented the same way. > Also, I just noticed that I probably completely ignored the original message > about this dated July 4. Sorry about that--I was in the hospital waiting for > the arrival of my first child. > Needless to say, it's been a crazy summer :-). > Congrats !! Eli --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ply-hack" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ply-hack?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
