This would be great to have! Is it doable? I can also try to lend a hand if necessary.
regards, -- Nuno Lopes On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:52 PM, David Beazley <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm almost wondering if PLY should just write the tables out as a pickle or > something. Someone already patched it to do something similar. I could > certainly make an option for doing it. Open to ideas on this. > > Cheers, > Dave > > On Mar 20, 2009, at 7:45 AM, Nuno Lopes wrote: > >> >> Hello, >> >> As a last resort to solve this: is there a way to modularize the >> generated code on parsetab.py? Mostly wishful thinking here I would >> assume there isn't! >> >> Thanks a lot, >> -- >> Nuno Lopes >> >> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Nuno Lopes >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> On 14 Mar 2009, at 03:34, David Beazley wrote: >>> >>>> Having looked at the parsetab.py file on this, this might be a >>>> possibility. The file is pretty big and has some extremely long >>>> unbroken >>>> lines in it. Maybe it's bumping up against some kind of line-length >>>> limit >>>> or something. Very interesting. >>> >>> >>> The size of the file seems to be problem, from the jython list I got >>> this >>> reply: >>> >>> The generated Java method is too big for the JVM to handle. >>> >>> <http://bugs.jython.org/issue527524> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Nuno Lopes >>> >> >> >> > > -- Nuno Lopes --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ply-hack" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ply-hack?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
