> Reduce/reduce conflicts are almost always bad---they mean that certain > rules in your grammar will never be triggered.
Hmm, this isn't right? I have a total of 4 R/R conflicts and in all situations the rule that is on the "losing end" does get triggered in other contexts. General question: for every R/R conflict, is there a way to write the grammar that is equivalent but does not produce a conflict? Or are some grammars inherently ambiguous an will always have conflicts? If someone could point me to resources covering these practical aspects of LR grammars I'd appreciate it... Thanks Pedro --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ply-hack" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ply-hack?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
